I wish I had taken the time to record my thoughts and try to transcribe them instead of the pathetic attempt to post the following:
Jenna has an assignment due
today. She asked if I could bounce
around some ideas in order to help her.
The topic is “Defunding the
Police – Why or Why
Not?” Her thoughts
mirrored my own when the subject started making its way around facebook.
“Why would we defund the police? That is so wrong. It’s their job to serve and protect us. Why would we want to take that away?”
I obviously had not understood why so many seemed to support it until I saw this political cartoon
this was shared on facebook. Unfortunately I am
unable to cite its orginal source but would like to know
Defunding the police is not the same
as abolishing.
Have you ever watched “Little House
on the Prairie”
or westerns in which there is only one doctor in
town. A jack of all trades one might
say. His job was to cure whatever ailed
the citizens whether it be a common cold, the fever, skin rashes, bullet
wounds, delivering babies . . . a doctor was expected to know it all and cater
to all regardless of age. And though
many doctors may have known a little about so much of what was required or
expected the doctor did not everything.
Today
we have gynecologists, pediatricians, Ophthalmologists, podiatrists, Dermatologists,
cardiologists . . . the list goes on and on.
Each doctor specializes in a certain field. I think it is better to have multiple doctors
that cater to something specific than just one who tries to do it all. I think
it is the same with the police. Many
signed up with a specific goal in mind without having been trained for every
aspect one might associate with police work.
We need to spread the funds each to whatever specialty is required.
We have opinions on why we should defund the police or why we should not defund the police. I was most curious about how the police themselves felt about it. I do have friends in the law enforcement and would like to support them. I watched this video chat with Lee Adams from Vice (here) in which he addresses eight different law enforcement officers from across the nation.
Even among those
that are in law enforcement there are still conflicting ideas about why or why
not reallocate the taxpayers money. Though they agree on some things there are
still other items in which their opinions vary.
Two videos were shown – both which I had seen before. The focus is on ward involvement. The story unfolds as a man (I think his name
is Juan) loses his job and doesn’t know how he will tell his wife. On the same day he meets with the
missionaries. They start teaching him
and his life is changed. He introduces
the gospel to his wife, Julia. We are
asked how we as a ward will be able to include them into our fold.
Juan is computer savvy and is
introduced to someone in the church who is not.
The missionaries ask Juan to utilize his talents to assist ward members – an act of service. How can we, in return, help Juan. Introduce
him to someone who can relate. Same with
the Relief Society and Julia (Juan’s wife).
When we are in ward correlation or missionary meetings how can we involve
each organization? Who would be a good
fit? I get that. I understood that as a missionary.
It’s almost as though we are dehumanized with the mask and staying six feet apart – although I support the outline given. I just find it hard to reach out when I don’t feel a foundation of the initial start. I miss connecting with members – let alone those who are not. Hopefully they can feel the Spirit through the meetings themselves and may understand that human contact will come – we just don’t know when.