I wish that we would all apply this to our lives.
"you shouldn't judge a book by its cover" - what lies beneath could bear an element of surprise
Thursday, September 6, 2012
It's time to turn up the heat
I wish that we would all apply this to our lives.
Monday, September 3, 2012
There Must Be Uniformity at the Pulpit
Shortly after Roland was called to the
bishopric, he was asked to summarize a talk that had been given about the
conformity of testimonies and submit it to the monthly newsletter – which
actually didn’t exist before this particular bishopric.
Now there are a few people in the ward who
tend to drone on and on until the gratitude that is felt in their hearts turns
into penetrating boredom on the part of the audience. Every ward has them. They start off by expressing what it is that
brought them to the podium – and then they take us on a stroll down memory
lane, or into their health, or into their entire week. Gradually the testimony gets lost in their
words. And all eyes turn to the clock
and you can almost hear a chorus of silent groans.
Sometimes there is a dead silence and
often times the droner just feels it’s his (or her) duty to fill the silence
while the audience wonders which is worse: the silence or the droning on and
on.
Today it was announced in each first
meeting (primary, Relief Society and Priesthood) that if one spends more than
three minutes at the pulpit than it is no longer testimony. And we are reintroduced to five subjects that
should be topic of one’s testimony.
I get it to a certain degree – the timing
thing. Sadly, it doesn’t seem to
register with the ones who are guilty of running off the mouth. And though I do have a testimony of the five
given subjects, I don’t always feel inspired to share – especially because it
now seems so conforming. I like to hear
individual experiences and a brief history of the belief – but not by just one
individual for the whole entire meeting.
Sweet Jeff got up to bear his
testimony. He’d written it down so that
he wouldn’t stumble. And yet he
did. He is a member of the special
Olympics. They treat him like he
matters, but not all people do.
Our ward mission leader quickly followed
him up to the stand, and stood by his side.
The words he used were non-conforming and perhaps out of line with what
a true testimony is – but it was real.
It was genuine. And as he teared
up with his plea for prayer support, the ward mission leader stepped closer to
the mike and finished reading what Jeff had written.
Before Corey had even decided to go on a
mission, my dad had had a series of strokes.
His brain wasn’t able to communicate to his muscles quickly enough to
have them do what and when he wanted.
He had a one or two minute talk, but it
had taken him an entire minute just to get out the first sentence. Corey lovingly put his arms around dad and
asked him if he (my dad) would like Corey
to finish reading it. That moment
between Jeff and our ward mission leader triggered those memories. I started bawling. But it was actually a good memory – for there
had been so much gratitude on my dad’s part – it shined as he told Corey “thank
you.” And I wasn’t the only one
crying. Those who didn’t cry (if any)
were definitely in the minority.
Shortly after Jeff sat down, a couple came
to the stand. Roland and I often refer
to them as Frank and Marie Barone –though he is certainly way more humble
than Frank could even dream of. It’s
just the constant bickering they seem to do with one another. They genuinely do love one another. And perhaps their arguments are just playful
on their part (well at least on his) it still doesn’t seem in harmony with a
happy marriage.
He got it.
His testimony was short, sweet, covered at least three of the
subjects. He was very humble. His testimony was genuine. It was nice.
His wife didn’t drone on as much as usual
– but she did drone. Time to sit down,
Marie. Oh, I would not want the bishop’s
job for anything.
I enjoy watching the second
counselor. His expressions often mirror
my own thoughts. He looked like he was
trying to keep from laughing while the bishop painfully checked the clock. She finally sat down without his inviting her
to do so.
Overall, it really was a nice
meeting. Not a lot of conformity. I must say I liked that as well. I realize that I do not go to meetings to be entertained. But the heart gives me more focus than guidelines
do – though I really do understand their purpose. I just think it’s sad that so many of us have
to be asked to conform because there are individuals that just don’t get it –
even with the guidelines.
Friday, August 31, 2012
Another One Bites the Dust
Ode
to Skool Lunch
I
was working downtown when
I
first met you And you
were
fabulous!
You
welcomed me with
your
awesome deliciousness.
How
your scents penetrated in
my
nose and I thought I had
found
true love, but alas I
did
not visit you often.
Oh,
I wanted to –
I
wanted to savor the succulence
on
a daily basis –
only
there was a hole in my wallet.
I
was allowed to visit just
once
in a while and you were
always
so good to me. But you
always
left me wanting more.
How
I craved for that
Wonderful
chicken salad and
baked
goods that would
satisfy
my pallet.
Years
passed. I was
no
longer downtown but
at
the other end of the valley.
Imagine
my delight when
I
found you near my work.
Good
food. Good company.
I
introduced you to
my
friends. We saw you just
a
few times but still
not
often.
And
then I got married. My
finances
went down and
I
couldn’t visit you as often.
But
I did introduce you to
my
husband eventually.
We
saw you at least a
couple
of times – usually at
somebody
else’s expense.
It’s
been a while -
a
very long while and so
we
decided to visit you today
Only
to learn that you are gone.
The
economy killed you as
with
so many others. And there
was
a pang in my heart.
Truly.
Because
we had never had
the
intimate relationship that
I
so desired. Had I known that
your
death would be today, I
would
have paid my final
respects
to you yesterday –
To
taste of your goodness just
one
last time. To have
a
great last memory of your
wonderfulness. Instead my last
memory
of you will be a
note
on the door informing all that
you
closed at all locations on
August
31, 2012.
As
I write this loving tribute, there is
a
tear in my eye.
The
economy bites big time. Well,
that
is one reason why we haven’t
seen
you. It hit us long before it
hit
you. We understand. That doesn’t
make
it any easier.
Good-bye
my flavorsome friend.
KFRALC
KFRALC
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
A Triggered Doughnut Memory
When Jenna and her classmate left the
car this morning, they were talking about doughnuts – more specifically
doughnut holes.
I took Highness for a walk and smiled
as I thought at a memory about disappearing doughnuts.
My brother Corey and I are nine years
apart. We seem to share a lot in common –
particularly food habits. Eating
whatever is quick or handy. Our kitchen
skills were not the greatest. Plus we both appeared to be on the lazy side.
We also have a brother Patrick – who is
two years younger than I and our baby sister, Kayla, who is thirteen years
younger. They are both survivor’s. And both were quite comfortable in the
kitchen from an early age.
When we were younger, we used to taunt
Corey by saying that Kayla could be out in the dessert and live off the land;
she would never go hungry. Corey, on the
other hand, could have starved to death less than three feet from a fully
stocked refrigerator.
Afterall she was four and he was eight
when he ran down the hall to our mom’s bedroom.
“Mama! Mama! Kayla is making toast!”
“So.”
“But I’m older than her. And even I don’t know how to make toast.”
I don’t recall how old Corey was when our
family received one of those novelty doughnut makers. It was actually quite a cool product
according to the late ‘70’s standards.
Patrick had made dozens of doughnuts (note: only two doughnuts can be
cooked at a time) and Corey decided that it was going to be his turn.
He had asked my mom if he could make
doughnuts. She said “no” – but he
pressed her. I don’t know if she finally
gave in or if he just chose to disobey.
But the girl from across the street had come over and he decided that
they would make doughnuts together.
He obviously did not follow a recipe as he
used at least one cup of baking soda.
The doughnut batter had already been poured into the doughnut maker when
Patrick and his friends (also from across the street) and I watched as he tried
to impress Becky with what would be the first doughnuts he had fully made by
himself.
The look on his face was priceless as he
opened up the container and the batter he had worked so hard on had disappeared
– except for a tiny bit of residue in the bottom. Becky lovingly scooped up what was left and
held it to her mouth and tasted it.
“This is really good,” she said in a
pathetic attempt to make Corey feel better.
The look on mom’s face was quite
hostile. She had specifically told Corey
NO and there was really no way we could salvage the rest of the batter (did I
mention he had doubled the recipe?) and
we all sensed that Corey was going to get a beating so severe that we might all
feel the pain from it.
But then Becky’s brother laughed about his
own memories and said, “It’s alright Corey.
We all make mistakes” and then proceeded to spit out every bad thing we
had ever done – burning experimental dinners, hiding food (I specifically remember
half a roast and a turkey) in his room and then forgetting about it (but an unpleasant
odor would reveal what he had done and he would get into trouble for it),
lighting the grass on fire . . . the list went on and on.
It was quite a few years later when my mom
said Becky’s brother probably saved Corey’s life that day. You’d think after all those horrifying
memories she would have wanted to strangle us all – except she was laughing
with us. Except for the grass fire. That had been way to close to the house.
I think Corey and I have both gotten
better in the kitchen. Still not our
favorite haunt. But we won’t die of
starvation. I don’t recall what happened
to the doughnut maker.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Explaining Blogs
When Corey started his Blog over six
years ago, he gave himself a false identity.
He’s since been discovered by some, and I know from my own mouth there
are even more that know the nature of his true identity. However, because he hadn’t revealed his true identity
on his Blog (there are certain individuals he still feel might need protection having
their real identities revealed out of connection) I decided to keep mine anonymous
also.
I have changed the names of most of
those I have or will mention. I started
out using “Cody” instead of “Corey” but “Cody” was/is his name, not mine. So I changed it. And now it doesn’t seem to matter one way or
another. He’s out and those mentioned
may not need his protection anymore – though he continues with his name and
only partial pictures.
I also keep myself anonymous for fact that
Roland’s ex-wife is a sue happy individual – and I’ll leave it at that.
I often write things that sound a bit
odd to me and ask for Corey’s assistance on changing the wording or grammar or
whatever. One was the idea for a post
that I didn’t think I would ever post. But
he told me I should and asked if he could borrow some of it for his own
Blog. I was flattered.
So I added two pages to the two pages
I had already sent over. I created a
post and attached it on February 26, 2012.
I was surprised to see that Corey posted the entire thing instead of just
“some of it” as I thought. He called it
“My Sister’s words and an Endorsement” I had called it “We all Feel Excluded atTimes”
At the End of Corey’s post, he refers
to my Blog as a point of Interest. That
was nice of him. So it’s provided a
little bit of exposure – though it may have without his mentioning it in his post
– because the name of my Blog appears in his side bar as one that he follows.
I have followed a couple of blogs that
have stopped. Life got in the way for
one – and pressing issues for another who has to sort out a mess that was
created and somehow relates to her blog and so she is waiting for the right
time to change everything to something better and hopefully more secure.
Both have had guest bloggers. The latter said she was searching for
humorous stories and has always given me credit for the ones she has used. It’s
an honor having been mentioned on a few blogs themselves and not just in the
comments.
I would also like to thank those who have
commented thus far. When my window says,
“You’ve Got Mail!” it’s nice to see it
is a comment from an actual person and not just another advertisement. Thank you Corey, Heather and Kris.
Posts that Inspire
Recently I was googling Individual
Worth in search for a proper definition to use in one of my posts. As I went searching I pulled up a few blog
sites with inspiring stories which I would like to share and reference.
I came across an object lesson given
by Stephanie Waite in which she laid out various belongings on a table and
asked her class what each object was worth and what made them valuable. Some of the objects were perhaps expensive
things and some objects may have been more valuable to one than to
another. But the particular object that
may have seemed worthless to most individuals was probably the most valuable
thing on the table in the eyes of its initial owner.
It actually reminded me of an object
that is close to Jenna – a stuffed dog she’s had since she was 6 months old –
though the toy itself looks like he’s been around much longer than she has.
It’s been restuffed twice and has had matted hair cut off – never to grow back
again. But Jenna loves it. It’s her baby. It’s her lifelong friend.
Recently she allowed her cousin to
“borrow” it – a huge sacrifice on her part.
But Kayla (my sister) was not all that thrilled about inviting Jenna’s
beat up toy (which really is clean – but appears to be unkempt) into her house
and chose to leave it in the trunk of her car.
What makes something or someone
valuable? Love? The kind of love that makes you valuable no
matter what. No matter how beaten or
ratty (inside or out) I loved her
post. I loved her explanation. And you can read the full post here.
Stephanie’s last post referred me to another
blog. I read a post that could fall into
the category of Choice and Accountability.
What a tough decision to be made – and yet what remarkable faith and
strength that would help so many others.
Collin Presley had health problems
from the time he was born. He outlived
his disease by twelve years (from my understanding) but died shortly after a
new medication was given.
Their first thought was to sue the
doctor. Collin still had life with the
old medication. Surely someone had to
blamed for Collin’s death – but an autopsy would have to be preformed to
provide proof. Doing an autopsy would
upset the organs which the family wanted to donate to those who were still
fighting the fight. A battle with attorneys
would have been so costly. It wouldn’t
bring Collin back. On the flip side his
organs could be donated and bring life to others. That was the choice they faced. You can read more of their story in this post though I
recommend venturing even further with prior posts
Katy Pluim amazes me with her short
sweet posts as she deals with having only one arm. I am so impressed with the things that she has taught herself that I struggle with having two arms. She is a beautiful person with a husband and a three year old (almost three) daughter. Here is one of her earlier posts on dealing.
Unfortunately I did not copy the reference
for this next story. I tried going back
to my initial research and to Google–ing with the given subject, but more sites
were brought up than I cared to wade through.
My apologies to the blogger (though there are many more resources for
this particular story:
“More than one hour after the gold-medal
athlete had crossed the finish line during the marathon in the 1968 Summer
Olympics in Mexico City, John Stephen Akhwari of Tanzamia entered the
stadium. Only a few spectators remained
as the lone runner appeared. The
athlete’s leg was injured and bleeding.
He was dehydrated and confuse. As
he crossed the finish line, the small crowd cheered in appreciation for what
would become one of the most famous last-place finishes in history. But it
wasn’t the runner’s performance that caught their attention – and the attention
of thousands more during the almost five decades since. It was his desire to finish the race, to
endure to the end. After the event in
1968, a reporter asked the runner why he had not quit the race since he had no
chance of winning. The Tanzanian athlete was confused. “My country did not send me to Mexico City to
start the race,” he replied. “They sent
me to finish”
I actually shared this next story in
Relief Society when the instructor asked the class for comments about
Integrity. What goes around comes
around. I think this is a really great
example.
And finally one idea to teach in
classrooms – though children are more accepting and perhaps this ought to be
applied to all adults as well Stop the
bullying already. We are all different.
Embrace the differences.
How great it is to have so many great
insights and so many who support one another through their blogs and create
ideas and share. Thank you!
Friday, August 24, 2012
Chopped, Snipped, Spliced and Discarded – I could SO use that Money
Before Roland and I moved from our first house, he
introduced me to the reality show “Chopped” a one hour show that gives four
chefs the opportunity to create appetizers, entrees, and desserts using four
specific ingredients – most I haven’t been familiar with or think of as too bizarre
to belong with either the rest of the
ingredients or in the particular round.
I would think that there is more than
eight hours of footage for each episode of “Chopped” – thus it is not just the
chefs competing who get “chopped” but the editing as well. It sickens me to know that all this wasted
footage exists – that so much tape ends up on the floor. The expense that goes into these reality series
(Wife Swap is another example) and all the waste. I could really use the money that is spent on
wasted film. So many Americans could –
especially in this economy that seemingly continues to spiral downhill. Where are the priorities of this nation?
Recently there was a documentary on
NBC called: “Mormons in America: NBC's Rock Center with Brian Williams" and actually I feel a certain amount of
emotion which I stated in my last post.
I think Rock Center handled “Mormons in
America” well. Some accused of focusing
too much on the small percentage that “don’t really represent the entire church”
well guess what? It’s that small
percentage that the world will be looking at. And I think it’s wonderful that
it has been presented to the world (or nation anyway) that there might be a
better understanding.
Abby Huntsman does not represent the
entire Church. Who does? Some criticized that the creators of the
program should have gone to the authorities or at least devout members to for a
more accurate understanding. But we are
a very diverse people – even among ourselves.
The gospel values are true regardless of its members. But the members are not perfect. We are not all cut out of the same mold – and
the world needs to know that there are struggles that many members face that
don’t always correspond with what the gospel principles teach.
I think the documentary was handled very
nicely. And I think Abby did a great job
letting people understand her position but still being respectful of the
Church. She probably has a better hold on what a non member might feel. There are many who have left the church who
experience that “ah-hah” moment after they’ve been away for it – not that they
disagree or become uncomfortable – but all the sudden understand the meaning of
“a peculiar people” and understand the non-members view – whereas those who are
so close to the surface don’t have that same understanding. They don’t see the forest for the trees. Corey explained it a little bit in this post
There are many members (or former
members) who have had their feelings hurt for whatever reason. Treated like outcasts. Overaggressive concern isn’t handled
correctly either on the part of the leaders or the interpretation of the member
(I think more of the first; as an example Abby’s bishop told her that she
wouldn’t receive the same blessings – and although it may have been said out of
concern – it hadn’t been communicated in a proper manner) I like the way Clive Durham said it in this post
Bishop, stake president, and other
leadership positions are held by people.
Imperfect people. Some, who unfortunately abuse their power, some, who
should have never been put in that position to begin with. Some who would rather not be there and wonder
why the position was accepted in the first place.
Julienne (sp?) and Al Jackson do NOT
represent all members. A large majority,
perhaps. But certainly NOT all
members. Mitch Mayne is told he can keep
his position in the Church so long as he remains celibate. Celibate?
Really? In a Church that pushes
marriage and family? (And there are many who actually do push)
That was Corey’s plan - to remain celibate
– though he wasn’t fulfilled. He would
have been able to keep his membership – but still not feel whole – not complete. He did NOT go in search for a partner. Truth is, when they initially met, he tried
to avoid it.
Their first encounter together was working on the same production in Las Vegas. The two of them started out with a casual dinner, but after a while Corey's feelings deepened towards his partner. He started to have feelings that he had been told all of his life were wrong to have.
Corey returned home from Las Vegas the
first Christmas after they had met.
Relieved in some ways not to be tempted by something he had been trying
to avoid all of his life. Yet torn
because he really did have emotions for this guy. And what a wonderful guy he is. I really really do like Corey’s partner.
Eventually it turned into something
very beautiful. Both celibate. Both wanting to wait. Both yearning for God to be a part of their “marriage”
and I have no doubts that He is. Corey
had to give up his membership. But he
did not give up on the gospel. He still attends
Sunday meetings (minus the priesthood which he was never comfortable with in
the first place) and though it’s often hard for him not to be able to
participate to the fullest – Corey is happier than he has ever been in his
entire life.
Corey is very knowledgeable in the gospel. He is very well rounded individual. He doesn’t represent the entire Church – even
when he was a member. But he does make
an impact. A GREAT impact. He has a very strong and beautiful
testimony. He is one of many pioneers on
a path that is slowly being smoothed over and more widely traveled – and yet
too many who are on that path feel alone and unwanted and aren’t always handled
with care. Corey, fortunately, has had
amazing support. Yet it seems to be a rarity with far too many.
We have a friend who is strongly
opinionated and probably more of a feminist than Joanna Brookes. She is married to one who has been on the
high council as well as other prominent positions. Both strong in the gospel. Each representing what sometimes appear as
conflicting ideas. And I love them
both. And I respect them both. And I am personally grateful for the
diverseness.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





