Roland was watching a documentary the
other day about the brain and its functions.
The first series was about the hippocampus and explained how sometimes
our memories are distorted. In other
words, we sometimes remember details but do not relate them accurately, or else
we are accurate but the memories are not our personal memories but rather
someone else’s. Examples that were used
came from those who were affected by September 11, 2001 so much that they felt
they had been there when the towers were struck and crumbled. Sometimes our memories are fabricated.
I notice the “fabrication” each time
Roland relates experiences about our marriage or when he relates memories of
the boys. He always tells it a bit
differently until after a while it doesn’t sound like there's much truth to it. But then again, I probably do that too - especially as I get older. I notice that I don't remember all the details as vividly as I did at one time.
Earlier last month, Roland bore his
testimony in church and tried to relate the experience we had shared with the
boys during a family home evening found at the end of this post. He told about how each boy had been given
twenty dollars and what the results were and made a comparison to their lives
today. While the analogy of his
fabricated story seemed impressive, there were some inaccuracies – even from
the way he tried to compare it to the scriptures found in Matthew 25 (he had
retold that inaccurately as well) which is all the more reason each of us need to write things
down.
I know if I don’t have the opportunity
of writing my thoughts down when they occur, I forget the details. Believe it or not, I did not complete my
original thoughts on Bandon but still managed to get out five posts. But I know they weren’t as accurate as they
would have been if I could have recorded it as it was happening. Even Corey has been guilty of this (see here)
– commenting that his head was full of ideas and he wanted to write future
posts for so many subjects including my daughter’s baptism. I looked forward to reading his thoughts, but
alas, they never got posted as the details had been removed from his
hippocampus.
The point is: what we perceive as
facts change over time. Roland had the
boys with our youngest making lots of money, our oldest doing okay but only
breaking even, however he had our middle son spot on as he drank “his talent” –
hid it within himself. He compared it to
the success that our youngest seems to be doing financially, our oldest living
with his in-laws (his late wife’s parents) with his girlfriend and daughter –
never having settled on just one job.
And then our middle son who has been on probation from his job and is
currently on welfare.
My oldest son seems to be living a
soap opera kind of life – which I have touched on a little bit. Our youngest
just moved to New York and has moved into an existing home. I thought it an
interesting analogy as Roland related their “talent usage” compared to real
life.
No comments:
Post a Comment